Read the free interactive preview of AI Security From PsyOps to CyberOps Start Reading Free →
AI SECURITY, UNIFIED ACROSS THREE SURFACES

Different attacks.
Different physics.
One perimeter.

SecuredAI is a boutique security firm built for one problem: customer chatbots, internal RAG, and agentic AI workflows fail in different ways — and defending them usually means stitching together red teams, guardrail vendors, and IAM consultants who don't talk to each other. We run all three under one team, one methodology, one point of contact.

Agent & LLM security. F around and find out.

03 threat surfaces covered
Offense + Defense + Identity in one engagement
Web · Mobile · Voice · MCP channel coverage
PERIMETER.MONITOR LIVE
Chatbotsweb · mobile · voice
RAGinternal knowledge
AgenticAPIs · DBs · MCP
SecuredAI Perimeter — red team, runtime guardrails & gateway, and identity governance applied per-surface, reported through one risk register.
THE THREE SURFACES

Each surface fails differently — so testing it the same way misses the point.

A prompt-injection scanner built for a chatbot won't catch a RAG poisoning path, and neither will catch an over-permissioned agent calling a production API. We treat each surface as its own discipline, with its own attack library and its own control set.

01 / 03

Customer-facing chatbots

WEBMOBILEVOICE / IVR

Every public channel is an open input to a model that can see account data, pricing logic, and internal instructions. Attackers don't need a login — just a conversation.

  • Prompt injection & jailbreaks that override system instructions
  • Brand, legal, and pricing hallucinations stated as fact
  • Voice-channel spoofing and social-engineering scripts
  • Cross-channel inconsistency attackers use to find the weakest one
02 / 03

Internal RAG & knowledge search

DOCSWIKISTICKETSDATA WAREHOUSES

RAG collapses your access-control model into a single answer box. If retrieval doesn't respect document-level permissions, the model will happily quote the one file an employee shouldn't see.

  • Retrieval that ignores source-document permissions
  • Indirect prompt injection planted inside indexed content
  • Embedding & index poisoning that skews future answers
  • Sensitive data (PII, credentials, IP) surfaced out of context
03 / 03

Agentic workflows & tool access

APISDATABASESTICKETINGMCP SERVERS

Once a model can call tools, a manipulated conversation becomes a manipulated action — a refund issued, a ticket escalated, a query run against production. This is identity and access management with a nondeterministic actor in the loop.

  • Excessive tool scope & standing credentials per agent
  • Goal hijacking that chains legitimate tool calls into abuse
  • Unauthenticated or over-trusted MCP server connections
  • No audit trail linking an action back to its triggering intent
THE CAPABILITY MATRIX

Three surfaces. Three disciplines. One firm.

Most organizations end up assembling this matrix themselves — a red team firm here, a guardrail vendor there, an IAM consultancy for the rest — none of whom share findings. We run all nine cells as a single engagement with a shared risk register.

Offensive AssessmentRed team & adversarial testing
Runtime DefenseGuardrails & gateways
Identity & Access GovernanceLeast privilege, provenance
Chatbots

Conversation red teaming

Multi-turn jailbreak & injection campaigns across web, mobile, and voice, scored against your policy, not a generic benchmark.

Inline guardrail tuning

Policy-aware input/output filtering and gateway rules calibrated from your red team findings, not off-the-shelf defaults.

Session & entitlement scoping

Ensures the bot only ever answers with what the authenticated user is entitled to see, across every channel.

Internal RAG

Retrieval & poisoning tests

Adversarial documents and indirect injection payloads planted to test whether retrieval leaks across permission boundaries.

Retrieval-time policy gates

Query and chunk-level filtering that enforces document ACLs at retrieval, not just at the front door.

Source-of-truth mapping

Reconciles index permissions against the underlying document store so retrieval can never outrun access rights.

Agentic workflows

Tool-chain exploitation

Simulated goal-hijacking and privilege-escalation paths across your APIs, ticketing systems, and MCP integrations.

Action gateway & policy engine

A control point in front of every tool call — approving, rewriting, or blocking actions before they hit production systems.

Per-agent least privilege

Scoped, short-lived credentials per agent and task, with full action-to-intent audit trails for every tool invocation.

HOW AN ENGAGEMENT RUNS

Five stages, one register, no handoffs between vendors.

The sequence matters: we don't harden a surface before we understand how it actually breaks, and we don't govern access before defenses are calibrated against real findings.

01

Discover

Map every chatbot channel, RAG pipeline, and agentic workflow in scope — including the tools, APIs, and MCP servers each agent can reach. Most surprises live here.

02

Test

Red team each surface with attack techniques specific to it: conversational jailbreaks, retrieval poisoning, tool-chain hijacking. Every finding is reproducible and severity-scored.

03

Harden

Deploy or tune runtime guardrails and gateways calibrated directly from the findings above — not generic policy packs.

04

Govern

Rebuild identity and access boundaries around what the testing actually revealed: least-privilege scopes for agents, permission-aware retrieval, entitlement-aware chat responses.

05

Monitor

Stand up ongoing detection and a shared risk register across all three surfaces, so new features and new agents are assessed before they ship, not after an incident.

GROUNDED IN ESTABLISHED FRAMEWORKS

We don't invent a private taxonomy of AI risk.

Findings and controls are mapped back to frameworks your security, risk, and audit teams already recognize — so results are portable into existing governance, not a parallel process.

OWASP Top 10 for LLM Applications
MITRE ATLAS
NIST AI Risk Management Framework
OWASP Agentic AI Threats
MCP security guidance
ISO/IEC 42001 alignment
NOT SURE WHERE YOU'RE EXPOSED?

Start with a 10-minute surface assessment — no call required.

Answer a few questions about your chatbot, RAG, and agentic footprint and get a risk profile with concrete next steps, mapped to the matrix above.

GET IN TOUCH

Tell us about your surfaces. We'll tell you where the risk actually sits.

Every engagement starts with a short scoping conversation — no obligation, no generic sales deck.

Emailcontact@securedai.org
BasedDistributed team · engagements worldwide
Response timeWithin one business day

Submitting opens a pre-filled email to contact@securedai.org — nothing is sent automatically from this page.